Patient and public involvement in the development of health services: Engagement of underserved populations in a quality improvement programme for inflammatory bowel disease using a community-based participatory approach.

INTRODUCTION: Involving people with lived experience is fundamental to healthcare development and delivery. This is especially true for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) services, where holistic and personalised models of care are becoming increasingly important. There is, however, a significant lack of representation of underserved and diverse groups in IBD research, and there are significant barriers to healthcare access and utilisation among minority groups in IBD. IBD centres need to be aware of these experiences to address barriers via service changes, improve interactions with local communities and promote meaningful engagement for improved health outcomes. METHODS: A pragmatic community-based approach was taken to engage with leaders and members of underserved groups across 11 workshops representing Roma, Afro-Caribbean, people of African descent and the wider black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) communities, Muslim women, refugee community members, deprived areas of South Yorkshire, LGBTQ+ and deaf populations. Thematic analysis of field notes identified patterns of attention across the community groups and where improvements to services were most frequently suggested. RESULTS: Findings demonstrated several barriers experienced to healthcare access and utilisation, including language accessibility, staff attitudes and awareness, mental health and stigma, continuity of support, and practical factors such as ease of service use and safe spaces. These barriers acted as a lever to co-producing service changes that are responsive to the health and social care needs of these groups. CONCLUSIONS: Engaging with people from a range of communities is imperative for ensuring that service improvements in IBD are accessible and representative of individual needs and values. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Local community leaders and members of community groups actively participated in the co-design and development of improvements to the IBD service for a local hospital. Their contributions further informed a pilot process for quality improvement programmes in IBD centres.

Pain screening in youth with sickle cell disease: A quality improvement study.

BACKGROUND: Youth with sickle cell disease (SCD) face several challenges as they age, including increased pain frequency, duration, and interference. The purpose of this study was to (i) determine the feasibility of routine pain screening; (ii) identify and describe various clinical pain presentations; and (iii) understand preferences/resources related to engaging in integrative health and medicine (IHM) modalities within an outpatient pediatric SCD clinic. METHODS: During routine outpatient visits, patients aged 8-18 completed measures of pain frequency, duration, and chronic pain risk (Pediatric Pain Screening Tool [PPST]). Participants screening positive for (i) persistent or chronic pain or (ii) medium or high risk for persistent symptoms and disability on the PPST were asked to complete measures of pain interference, pain catastrophizing, and interest in/resources for engaging in IHM modalities. RESULTS: Between March 2022 and May 2023, 104/141 (73.8%) patients who attended at least one outpatient visit were screened. Of these 104 (mean age 12.46, 53.8% female, 63.5% HbSS), 34 (32.7%) reported persistent or chronic pain, and 48 (46.2%) reported medium or high risk for persistent symptoms and disability. Patients completing subsequent pain screening measures reported a mean pain interference T-score of 53.2 ± 8.8 and a mean pain catastrophizing total score of 24.3 ± 10.2. Patients expressed highest interest in music (55.6%) and art therapy (51.9%) and preferred in-person (81.5%) over virtual programming (22.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive pain screening is feasible within pediatric SCD care. Classifying patients by PPST risk may provide a means of triaging patients to appropriate services to address pain-related psychosocial factors.

Improving patient safety through mandatory quality improvement (QI) education in a family medicine residency programme.

Although the American College of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requires that medical trainees acquire competencies in patient safety and quality improvement (QI), no standard curriculum exists. We envisaged that a sustainable QI curriculum would be a pragmatic way to improve residents' skills and competence in patient safety. Our aim was to develop and evaluate a patient safety-oriented QI curriculum in an established family medicine residency programme. A patient safety curriculum fulfilling ACGME requirements was developed and implemented in a family residency programme. The curriculum comprised didactics, self-paced online modules, experiential learning through individual QI projects, and mortality and morbidity conferences. The programme was evaluated using a survey at the end of its first year. We assessed knowledge on patient safety and QI, confidence in discussing safety concerns with peers, and ability to recognise safety gaps and initiate corrective actions. We also assessed the perception of the programme's relevance to the residents' training. All 36 residents participated, 19 completed the evaluation survey. Fifteen (79%) respondents reported learning more about the causes of medical errors, 42% could report safety concerns and 26% could recognise quality gaps. In addition, 58% felt the curriculum increased their confidence in discussing patient safety concerns with peers while 74% found the curriculum very relevant to their training. Some participants described the programme as 'very productive'. Embedding a QI curriculum into the ongoing residency training may be a realistic approach to training family medicine residents with no prior formal QI training.

Increasing rates of screening and treatment of iron deficiency in ambulatory patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a quality improvement cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) is common in patients with heart failure (HF) and is associated with advanced HF and increased mortality. Intravenous iron supplementation increases exercise tolerance, improves quality of life, and decreases symptoms among patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and iron deficiency. Despite this, many patients are not screened or treated for IDA. We aimed to increase rates of screening and treatment of IDA among HF patients through the introduction of curated materials to aid HF clinicians with appropriate screening and treatment. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review to identify the baseline number of HFrEF patients screened and treated for IDA at two ambulatory cardiology clinics in Toronto, Ontario. A quality improvement initiative was then introduced, which consisted of education and curated materials to aid clinicians in the screening and treatment of IDA among HFrEF patients. The proportion of patients screened and treated for IDA preintervention and postintervention were compared using χ2 tests of Independence. RESULTS: In the preintervention cohort, 36.3% (n=45) of patients with anaemia were screened for IDA. Among those screened, 64.4% (n=29) had IDA. Only 17.2% (n=5) of these were treated with IV iron. After implementation of the quality improvement initiative, 90.9% (n=60) of patients with anaemia were screened for IDA (p<0.001) and 90.3% (n=28) of those with IDA were treated with IV iron (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The introduction of curated materials to aid clinicians was associated with increased rates of screening and treatment of IDA among ambulatory HFrEF patients. Further work is required to identify barriers and implement strategies to increase screening and treatment rates of IDA among HFrEF patients.

Effect of urbanization and urban forests on water quality improvement in the Yangtze River Delta: A case study in Hangzhou, China.

In the context of rapid global urbanization, the sustainable development of ecosystems should be considered. Accordingly, the Planetary Boundaries theory posits that reducing the amount of nitrogen and phosphorus pollutants entering bodies of water is necessary as excess levels may harm the aquatic environment and reduce in water quality. Thus, based on the long-term monitoring data of representative urban rivers in the Yangtze River Delta region, we evaluated the nitrogen and phosphorus pollution of water bodies in different urbanization stages and further quantified the effect of urban forests on water quality improvement. The results showed that, with the continuous progression of urbanization, the proportion of impervious surface area increased, along with the levels of nitrogen and phosphorus pollution in water bodies. The critical period of water quality deterioration in urban rivers occurred during the medium urbanization level when the proportion of impervious surface area reached 55-65 %, and the probability of an abrupt increase in total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) concentration exceeded 95 %. However, increasing the area of urban forests during this period reduced TN pollution by 36.64 % and TP pollution by 49.03 %. The results of this study support the expansion of urban forests during the medium urbanization stage to improve water quality. Furthermore, our results provide a reference and theoretical basis for urban forest construction as a key aspect of the sustainable development of the urban ecosystem in the Yangtze River Delta and similar regions around world.

Implementation and impact of integrated health and social care services: an umbrella review.

Governments in many European countries have been working towards integrating health and social care services to eliminate the fragmentation that leads to poor care coordination for patients. We conducted a systematic review to identify and synthesize knowledge about the integration of health and social care services in Europe. We identified 490 records, in 14 systematic reviews that reported on 1148 primary studies and assessed outcomes of integration of health care and social care. We categorized records according to three purposes: health outcomes, service quality and integration procedures outcomes. Health outcomes include improved clinical outcomes, enhanced quality of life, and positive effects on quality of care. Service quality improvements encompass better access to services, reduced waiting times, and increased patient satisfaction. Integration procedure outcomes involve cost reduction, enhanced collaboration, and improved staff perceptions; however, some findings rely on limited evidence. This umbrella review provides a quality-appraised overview of existing systematic reviews.

Quality Improvement Efforts in VA Community Living Centers Following Public Reporting of Performance.

For two decades, the U.S. government has publicly reported performance measures for most nursing homes, spurring some improvements in quality. Public reporting is new, however, to Department of Veterans Affairs nursing homes (Community Living Centers [CLCs]). As part of a large, public integrated healthcare system, CLCs operate with unique financial and market incentives. Thus, their responses to public reporting may differ from private sector nursing homes. In three CLCs with varied public ratings, we used an exploratory, qualitative case study approach involving semi-structured interviews to compare how CLC leaders (n = 12) perceived public reporting and its influence on quality improvement. Across CLCs, respondents said public reporting was helpful for transparency and to provide an "outside perspective" on CLC performance. Respondents described employing similar strategies to improve their public ratings: using data, engaging staff, and clearly defining staff roles vis-à-vis quality improvement, although more effort was required to implement change in lower performing CLCs. Our findings augment those from prior studies and offer new insights into the potential for public reporting to spur quality improvement in public nursing homes and those that are part of integrated healthcare systems.

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges in a Military Recruit Training Center of the Hellenic Navy: A Retrospective Analysis of the Poros Registry Serving as a Quality Improvement Project for Medical Officers.

INTRODUCTION: Basic military training (BMT) has been associated with increased morbidity burden. Nevertheless, the exact epidemiology of the encountered cases in the BMT of Greek recruits has never been assessed. The aim of this quality improvement project was to investigate for the first time the clinical patterns, rates, and severity of symptoms leading recruits to visit the infirmary of a recruit training center and use this knowledge to provide a practical guidance for the physicians in charge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All medical cases which were consecutively examined for the time range from November 2021 to September 2022 at the infirmary of the Hellenic Naval recruit training center in Poros, Greece, were retrospectively analyzed. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of "severe clinical status" (i.e., overnight sick bay confinement and/or transfer to a tertiary hospital within 24 h) and absence from BMT for at least 1 day. RESULTS: A total of 2,623 medical cases were examined during four recruit seasons from November 2021 to September 2022. Upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) and musculoskeletal injuries were the most frequent reasons for a recruit's visit to the infirmary (33.9% and 30.2%, respectively). 6.7% of the total cases were identified as having "severe clinical status." Specifically, in psychiatric, urological, and cardiovascular cases, febrile events were all independently associated with increased risk of "severe clinical status." There was a positive association between training week and absence from BMT, while febrile events and spring recruit season were also independently linked with increased probability of absence from BMT for at least 1 day. CONCLUSIONS: URTIs and musculoskeletal complaints were the primary reasons for recruits' presentation at the infirmary of a Greek recruit training center, leading to severe rates of attrition. Further registries and quality improvement projects are warranted to reach specific conclusions and reduce BMT-related morbidity and its subsequent implications.

A quality improvement approach to improving recognition of Maori tamariki (children) and assessing barriers to culturally responsive care in a paediatric ward setting.

BACKGROUND: Health inequity persists in Aotearoa (New Zealand) and internationally amongst most indigenous peoples. To address these health inequities, countries need to contend with the ramifications of entrenched historical, cultural and systemic failures. Within Aotearoa part of the solution to rectifying persistent health inequities lies in shifting everyday healthcare practices towards a more culturally responsive, patient-centred approach that utilises Maori knowledge and principles. Although the need for culturally responsive services in healthcare settings is clearly evident, most practitioners struggle with the challenge of creating a culturally safe environment. Further to these challenges, there are issues related to accurate recognition of ethnicity within the time constraints of an overwrought hospital environment. Within this environment, the correct identification of ethnicity is a fundamental step in the process of moving towards culturally responsive and more inclusive care. METHOD: The research was concerned with indigenous Maori patients being consistently and correctly identified so that they might receive culturally appropriate interaction and treatment. The research specifically focused on the impact of introducing a customised sticker prompt on the front cover of clinical notes of Maori tamariki (children) to assist with correct ethnicity identification. Surveys were conducted on the paediatric ward over a 3-week period, prior to and during the intervention to evaluate the effect of the customised stickers. This study sought to (1) assess the efficacy of a sticker to improve recognition of Maori tamariki (children), (2) examine key barriers to identifying ethnicity and (3) identify wider impacts of a sticker prompt on clinical practice. RESULTS: Results showed wide ranging positive impacts on clinical practice and culturally responsive care. Sixty-four per cent of participants indicated that the stickers were a useful tool to improve identification of Maori tamariki. Respondents reported increased accuracy of identifying patients by ethnicity, as well as improved awareness of existing ethnicity documentation, and increased engagement regarding cultural needs and ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified that sticker prompts are a useful tool for healthcare workers to improve recognition and awareness of ethnicity and to increase dialogue around cultural needs. The stickers led to increased consideration of the wider elements of holistic wellbeing and therefore improved culturally responsive care for Maori tamariki.

A Quality Improvement (QI) initiative in diagnostic stewardship of urine culture in an era of Laboratory Information Systems (LIS).

Standard urine culture is the gold standard for diagnosing urinary tract infections (UTIs) but fails to differentiate true UTI from asymptomatic bacteriuria, which is important to prevent the overuse of antibiotics. Correlation with the presence or absence of pyuria can be helpful in giving a hint of the true situation. With the help of Laboratory Information System (LIS), patients' urinalysis reports can be conveniently accessed and compared simultaneously with appropriate reports. In our study, a quality improvement initiative was planned for appropriate reporting of urine culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing using information obtained through LIS.

Addressing Veteran Health-Related Social Needs: How Joint Commission Standards Accelerated Integration and Expansion of Tools and Services in the Veterans Health Administration.

BACKGROUND: The Joint Commission recently named reduction of health care disparities and improvement of health care equity as quality and safety priorities (Leadership [LD] Standard LD.04.03.08 and National Patient Safety Goal [NPSG] Standard NPSG.16.01.01). As the largest integrated health system, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) sought to leverage these new accreditation standards to further integrate and expand existing tools and initiatives to reduce health care disparities and address health-related social needs (HRSNs). INITIATIVES AND TOOLS: A combination of existing data tools (for example, Primary Care Equity Dashboard), resource tools (for example, Assessing Circumstances and Offering Resources for Needs tool), and a care delivery approach (for example, Whole Health) are discussed as quality improvement opportunities to further integrate and expand how VHA addresses health care disparities and HRSNs. The authors detail the development timeline, building, limitations, and future plans for these tools and initiatives. COORDINATION OF INITIATIVES: Responding to new health care equity Joint Commission standards led to new implementation strategies and deeper partnerships across VHA that facilitated expanded dissemination, technical assistance activities, and additional resources for VHA facilities to meet new standards and improve health care equity for veterans. Health care systems may learn from VHA's experiences, which include building actionable data platforms, employing user-centered design for initiative development and iteration, designing wide-reaching dissemination strategies for tools, and recognizing the importance of providing technical assistance for stakeholders. FUTURE DIRECTIONS: VHA continues to expand implementation of a diverse set of tools and resources to reduce health care disparities and identify and address unmet individual veteran HRSNs more widely and effectively.

A multifaceted quality improvement intervention on venous thromboembolism prophylaxis compliance in hospitalized medical patients at a comprehensive cancer center.

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies suggest that quality improvement initiatives focused on hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism have a positive impact on prescribing rates of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, especially those that incorporate computerized changes. METHODS: We conducted a quality improvement project to determine whether education and computerized prescriber order entry system changes affect venous thromboembolism prophylaxis compliance rates in hospitalized medical patients at a Comprehensive Cancer Center. Between 1 January 2021 and 31 January 2023, 37,739 non-surgical, adult patient encounters with a length of stay > 48 h were analyzed in our study. From 18 December 2021 to 8 March 2022, provider education was delivered to the three largest admitting services, and computerized prescriber order entry changes were implemented incorporating a mandatory requirement to either order venous thromboembolism prophylaxis or document a contraindication for all patients at moderate venous thromboembolism risk. RESULTS: Monthly venous thromboembolism prophylaxis compliance rates, as defined by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services VTE-1 metric, increased from a mean of 74% to 93% after the interventions. This change was driven primarily by an increased utilization of mechanical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis from 37% to 53%. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that a multi-faceted intervention incorporating provider education and computerized prescriber order entry system changes can significantly increase venous thromboembolism prophylaxis compliance rates in cancer patients.

Transrectal osteopathic manipulation treatment for chronic coccydynia: feasibility, acceptability and patient-oriented outcomes in a quality improvement project.

CONTEXT: Pain of the coccyx, coccydynia, is a common condition with a substantial impact on the quality of life. Although most cases resolve with conservative care, 10 % become chronic and are more debilitating. Treatment for chronic coccydynia is limited; surgery is not definitive. Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) is the application of manually guided forces to areas of somatic dysfunction to improve physiologic function and support homeostasis including for coccydynia, but its use as a transrectal procedure for coccydynia in a primary care clinic setting is not well documented. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to conduct a quality improvement (QI) study to explore the feasibility, acceptability, and clinical effects of transrectal OMT for chronic coccydynia in a primary care setting. METHODS: This QI project prospectively treated and assessed 16 patients with chronic coccydynia in a primary care outpatient clinic. The intervention was transrectal OMT as typically practiced in our clinic, and included myofascial release and balanced ligamentous tension in combination with active patient movement of the head and neck. The outcome measures included: acceptance, as assessed by the response rate (yes/no) to utilize OMT for coccydynia; acceptability, as assessed by satisfaction with treatment; and coccygeal pain, as assessed by self-report on a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) for coccydynia while lying down, seated, standing, and walking. RESULTS: Sixteen consecutive patients with coccydynia were offered and accepted OMT; six patients also received other procedural care. Ten patients (two males, eight females) received only OMT intervention for their coccydynia and were included in the per-protocol analysis. Posttreatment scores immediately after one procedure (acute model) and in follow-up were significantly improved compared with pretreatment scores. Follow-up pain scores provided by five of the 10 patients demonstrated significant improvement. The study supports transrectal OMT as a feasible and acceptable treatment option for coccydynia. Patients were satisfied with the procedure and reported improvement. There were no side effects or adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the use of transrectal OMT for chronic coccydynia is feasible and acceptable; self-reported improvement suggests utility in this clinic setting. Further evaluation in controlled studies is warranted.

A Practical Guide to QI Data Analysis: Run and Statistical Process Control Charts.

Data analysis utilizing run charts and statistical process control (SPC) charts is a mainstay of quality improvement (QI) work. These types of time series analyses allow QI teams to evaluate patterns in data that may not be apparent with pre- and postintervention analysis. A run chart is most useful at the onset of a project when data points may be limited; points can be added prospectively to monitor for changes. An SPC chart is needed to determine if the system is "out of control," indicating an instance of special cause variation, and is recommended for more robust data analysis. These charts are valuable tools in identifying patterns of change, but cannot indicate what caused the change. QI teams can further investigate significant patterns to identify the impact of interventions and promote continued change or sustainability. In this article, we will provide a practical guide to the basics of run and SPC charts, including how to create and interpret them. The reader can use the supplemental data tables to gain the skills needed to build their own charts with readily available software. Finally, we will review more specialized software options that can assist in creation of run and SPC charts.

Putting co-creation into practice: lessons learned from developing a midwife-led quality improvement intervention.

BACKGROUND: Integrating evidence-based midwifery practices improves healthcare quality for women and newborns, but an evidence-to-practice gap exists. Co-created quality improvement initiatives led by midwives could bridge this gap, prevent resource waste and ensure intervention relevance. However, how to co-create a midwife-led quality improvement intervention has not been scientifically explored. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to describe the co-creation process and explore the needs and determinants of a midwife-led quality improvement targeting evidence-based midwifery practices. METHODS: A qualitative deductive approach using the Consolidated Framework for Advancing Implementation Science was employed. An analysis matrix based on the framework was developed, and the data were coded according to categories. Data were gathered from interviews, focus group discussions, observations and workshops. New mothers and birth companions (n = 19) were included through convenience sampling. Midwives (n = 26), professional association representatives, educators, policymakers, managers, and doctors (n = 7) were purposely sampled. RESULTS: The co-creation process of the midwife-led Quality Improvement intervention took place in four stages. Firstly, core elements of the intervention were established, featuring a group of midwife champions leading a quality improvement initiative using a train-the-trainers approach. Secondly, the intervention needs, context and determinants were explored, which showed knowledge and skills gaps, a lack of shared goals among staff, and limited resources. However, there was clear relevance, compatibility, and mission alignment for a midwife-led quality improvement at all levels. Thirdly, during co-creation workshops with new mothers and companions, the consensus was to prioritise improved intrapartum support, while workshops with midwives identified enhancing the use of birth positions and perineal protection as key focus areas for the forthcoming Quality Improvement intervention. Lastly, the findings guided intervention strategies, including peer-assisted learning, using existing structures, developing educational material, and building stakeholder relationships. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a practical example of a co-creation process for a midwife-led quality improvement intervention, which can be relevant in different maternity care settings.

Sustaining extended Kangaroo mother care in stable low birthweight babies in NICU: a quality improvement collaborative of six centres of Karnataka.

BACKGROUND: Kangaroo mother care (KMC) is a proven intervention for intact survival in preterms. Despite evidence, its adoption has been low. We used a point of care quality improvement (QI) approach to implement and sustain KMC in stable low birthweight babies from a baseline of 1.5 hours/baby/day to above 4 hours/baby/day through a series of plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles over a period of 53 weeks. METHODS: All babies with birth weight <2000 g not on any respiratory support or phototherapy and or umbilical lines were eligible. The key quantitative outcome was KMC hours/baby/day. A QI collaborative was formed between six centres of Karnataka mentored by a team with a previous QI experience on KMC. The potential barriers for extended KMC were evaluated using fishbone analysis. Baseline data were collected over 3 weeks. A bundled approach consisting of a variety of parent centric measures (such as staff awareness, making KMC an integral part of treatment order, foster KMC, awareness sessions to parents weekly, recognising KMC champions) was employed in multiple PDSA cycles. The data were aggregated biweekly and the teams shared their implementation experiences monthly. RESULTS: A total of 1443 parent-baby dyads were enrolled. The majority barriers were similar across the centres. Bundled approach incorporating foster KMC helped in the quick implementation of KMC even in outborns. Parental involvement and empowering nurses helped in sustaining KMC. Two centres had KMC rates above 10 hours/baby/day, while remaining four centres had KMC rates sustained above 6 hours/baby/day. Cross-learnings from team meetings helped to sustain efforts. Extended KMC could be implemented and sustained by low intensity training and QI collaboration. CONCLUSIONS: Formation of a QI collaborative with mentoring helped in scaling implementation of extended KMC. Extended KMC could be implemented by parent centric best practices in all the centres without any additional need of resources.

Intensive Case Management to Reduce Hospital Readmissions: A Pilot Quality Improvement Project.

PURPOSE OF STUDY: Hospital readmissions burden the U.S. health care system, and they have negative effects on patients and their families. The primary aim of this study was to pilot an intensive case management (ICM) intervention to reduce 30-day hospital readmissions. A secondary aim was to obtain patient- and caregiver-reported reasons for readmission. PRIMARY PRACTICE SETTING: The setting was a vertically integrated health care system located in Northern California. METHODOLOGY AND SAMPLE: This pilot quality improvement project occurred over a 4-month period. The intervention was delivered by master's degree students in nurse case management through an academic-clinical partnership. Patients hospitalized with a 30-day readmission were offered the ICM intervention. A total of 36 patients were identified and 20 accepted. Patient and/or caregiver was interviewed to identify reasons for their readmission. Data were collected about pre-/post-health care utilization including subsequent 30-day readmission. Mixed methods were used to analyze the findings. RESULTS: Thirteen of 20 enrolled patients received the weekly ICM intervention for at least 30 days. Seven declined further contact before 30 days. Patient-reported reasons for readmission included being discharged too soon, poor communication among providers and with patients/families, lack of understanding about disease management and/or treatment options, and inadequate support. Several patients believed that their readmission was unavoidable due to the complexity of their illnesses. We compared 30-day readmissions for those who participated in and those who declined the ICM intervention, finding that those who received the ICM intervention had a lower readmission rate than those who did not receive the intervention (35% vs. 37.5%).

Image quality improvement in bowtie-filter-equipped cone-beam CT using a dual-domain neural network.

BACKGROUND: The bowtie-filter in cone-beam CT (CBCT) causes spatially nonuniform x-ray beam often leading to eclipse artifacts in the reconstructed image. The artifacts are further confounded by the patient scatter, which is therefore patient-dependent as well as system-specific. PURPOSE: In this study, we propose a dual-domain network for reducing the bowtie-filter-induced artifacts in CBCT images. METHODS: In the projection domain, the network compensates for the filter-induced beam-hardening that are highly related to the eclipse artifacts. The output of the projection-domain network was used for image reconstruction and the reconstructed images were fed into the image-domain network. In the image domain, the network further reduces the remaining cupping artifacts that are associated with the scatter. A single image-domain-only network was also implemented for comparison. RESULTS: The proposed approach successfully enhanced soft-tissue contrast with much-reduced image artifacts. In the numerical study, the proposed method decreased perceptual loss and root-mean-square-error (RMSE) of the images by 84.5% and 84.9%, respectively, and increased the structure similarity index measure (SSIM) by 0.26 compared to the original input images on average. In the experimental study, the proposed method decreased perceptual loss and RMSE of the images by 87.2% and 92.1%, respectively, and increased SSIM by 0.58 compared to the original input images on average. CONCLUSIONS: We have proposed a deep-learning-based dual-domain framework to reduce the bowtie-filter artifacts and to increase the soft-tissue contrast in CBCT images. The performance of the proposed method has been successfully demonstrated in both numerical and experimental studies.

Standardized Calcium Replacement in Massive Transfusion: A Quality Improvement Project.

BACKGROUND: Hypocalcemia is common in trauma patients receiving massive transfusion protocol and often leads to worsening coagulopathies. Despite the identified problem and recommendations for replacement, few institutions have implemented a standardized calcium replacement protocol. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess whether a revised massive transfusion protocol, including standardized calcium replacement, increases the incidence of calcium administration in trauma patients receiving massive transfusion protocol. METHODS: This quality improvement project used a retrospective pre-/postdesign to study the revision of the current facility's massive transfusion protocol to include calcium replacement and ionized calcium monitoring at an urban Level I academic trauma center. Pre- and postintervention data were collected from January 2022 through October 2022 to determine the number of times massive transfusion protocol was ordered, ionized calcium monitoring, and calcium administration rates. Feedback regarding the protocol was collected throughout the monitoring period and was utilized in the final analysis. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients received massive transfusion protocol, preintervention, 18 of 23 (78%) received calcium supplementation, postintervention, 15 of 16 (98%) were treated. The majority of protocol activations occurred in the trauma bay (79%) and postintervention; ionized calcium monitoring dropped by 14%. CONCLUSION: This study found that the addition of standardized calcium replacement improved administration rates of calcium in this patient population. Ongoing research will ensure the recommended changes improve the identified shortcomings and that patients maintain adequate ionized calcium levels with the current dosing parameters.